This commentary is in response to “Commentary on Cues to Care: future directions for ecological landscapes” (Nassauer 2020) that stated there were “errors and apparent misunderstanding” of Cues to Care (CTC) in a published perspectives article (Hostetler in Urban Ecosyst 24:11–19, 2021). This perspectives article reviewed CTC studies that explored landscaping designs and maintenance practices needed to meet aesthetic expectations for managed urban and rural landscapes. I write this commentary to state that there were no misunderstandings of CTC by (Hostetler in Urban Ecosyst 24:11–19, 2021) and reiterate ways to conduct future CTC studies in order to create more sustainable landscapes.

该评论是为了回应“关于关怀线索的评论：生态景观的未来方向”（Nassauer 2020），该评论指出，在已发表的观点文章（城市生态系统中的 Hostetler 24:11-19，2021 年）。这篇观点文章回顾了 CTC 研究，这些研究探索了满足管理的城市和乡村景观的审美期望所需的景观设计和维护实践。我写这篇评论是为了说明 (Hostetler in Urban Ecosyst 24:11–19, 2021) 没有对 CTC 产生误解，并重申未来开展 CTC 研究以创造更可持续的景观的方法。