This article explores recent practices of States in relation to counterterrorism and armed conflict detention. Recent cases in the courts of the UK and US are drawn on to demonstrate the continued defence by those States of their administrative detention practices. Furthermore, the practice of other States in adopting new administrative detention laws as part of their counterterrorism strategies is explored. Finally, two examples of contemporary controversies are then considered to show where much of the debate is likely to be focused in the coming years, namely the use of other administrative measures short of detention, particularly assigned residence, and detentions carried out by armed groups that are supported by foreign States.

中文翻译：

---

反恐和武装冲突背景下的拘留：连续性和新挑战

本文探讨了各国最近在反恐和武装冲突拘留方面的做法。英国和美国法院最近的案件被用来证明这些国家对其行政拘留做法的持续辩护。此外，还探讨了其他国家将新的行政拘留法作为其反恐战略一部分的做法。最后，考虑当代争议的两个例子，以表明未来几年辩论的焦点可能集中在哪里，即使用除拘留以外的其他行政措施，特别是指定住所，以及由武装团体实施的拘留得到外国的支持。