As the state has become more susceptible to global pathologies, public policy scholars have found increasingly common ground with their IPE cousins. The development of these relatively young fields of study – increasingly they are sub-disciplines – has been commensurate but rarely intersecting. Yet contemporary maelstroms of global politics, economics, health, and security, span borders with ease, and increasingly force us to recognise, reconsider, and reconceptualise the overlapping realms of the national and international. In so doing, we must overcome the disciplinary distinctions. In this article, we traverse the prominent in-built disciplinary imperatives and methodologies that have kept these two disciplines from concerted inter-operability or, at least, interchange of theories and concepts. To do so, we begin by presenting a brief overview of the conceptual pedigrees and trajectories of these disciplines, before drawing attention to the prominent prevailing overlaps, ‘trespasses’ and tensions as they specifically relate to policy convergence and diffusion, and policy transfer. We proceed to specify a reconciliation of these tensions through, in the third section, a brief study of the growth of global administrations, administrators, and administrative spaces. This, we contend, stands as a paradigm case of how reconciled IPE/public policy concepts can produce enhanced theoretical and substantive insights into the transnationalising political world.

中文翻译：

---

治理全球政策：IPE 可以从公共政策中学到什么？

随着国家变得更容易受到全球病态的影响，公共政策学者与他们的 IPE 表亲发现了越来越多的共同点。这些相对年轻的研究领域——越来越多地成为子学科——的发展是相称的，但很少交叉。然而，当代全球政治、经济、健康和安全的漩涡轻而易举地跨越国界，越来越迫使我们认识、重新考虑和重新概念化国家和国际重叠领域。为此，我们必须克服学科差异。在本文中，我们遍历了突出的内置学科命令和方法，这些命令和方法使这两个学科无法协调一致的互操作性，或者至少是理论和概念的交换。为此，我们首先简要概述这些学科的概念谱系和轨迹，然后关注与政策趋同和扩散以及政策转移特别相关的突出的普遍重叠、“越界”和紧张关系。在第三部分，我们将通过对全球行政机构、行政人员和行政空间发展的简要研究，继续明确这些紧张关系的协调。我们认为，这是一个范式案例，说明协调一致的 IPE/公共政策概念如何能够对跨国政治世界产生增强的理论和实质性见解。“越界”和紧张局势，因为它们特别与政策趋同和扩散以及政策转移有关。在第三部分，我们将通过对全球行政机构、行政人员和行政空间发展的简要研究，继续明确这些紧张关系的协调。我们认为，这是一个范式案例，说明协调一致的 IPE/公共政策概念如何能够对跨国政治世界产生增强的理论和实质性见解。“越界”和紧张局势，因为它们特别与政策趋同和扩散以及政策转移有关。在第三部分，我们将通过对全球行政机构、行政人员和行政空间发展的简要研究，继续明确这些紧张关系的协调。我们认为，这是一个范式案例，说明协调一致的 IPE/公共政策概念如何能够对跨国政治世界产生增强的理论和实质性见解。