Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations,Perspectives on Psychological Science

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Perspect. Psychol. Sci. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations
Perspectives on Psychological Science ( IF 10.5 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-01 , DOI: 10.1177/1745691621999374
Daniel L Rosenfeld ₁ , Emily Balcetis ₂ , Brock Bastian ₃ , Elliot T Berkman _{4,

5} , Jennifer K Bosson ₆ , Tiffany N Brannon ₁ , Anthony L Burrow ₇ , C Daryl Cameron _{8,

9} , Serena Chen ₁₀ , Jonathan E Cook ₈ , Christian Crandall ₁₁ , Shai Davidai ₁₂ , Kristof Dhont ₁₃ , Paul W Eastwick ₁₄ , Sarah E Gaither ₁₅ , Steven W Gangestad ₁₆ , Thomas Gilovich ₁₇ , Kurt Gray ₁₈ , Elizabeth L Haines ₁₉ , Martie G Haselton _{1,

20,

21} , Nick Haslam ₃ , Gordon Hodson ₂₂ , Michael A Hogg ₂₃ , Matthew J Hornsey ₂₄ , Yuen J Huo ₁ , Samantha Joel ₂₅ , Frank J Kachanoff ₁₈ , Gordon Kraft-Todd ₂₆ , Mark R Leary ₁₅ , Alison Ledgerwood ₁₄ , Randy T Lee ₁₇ , Steve Loughnan ₂₇ , Cara C MacInnis ₂₈ , Traci Mann ₂₉ , Damian R Murray ₃₀ , Carolyn Parkinson ₁ , Efrén O Pérez _{1,

31} , Tom Pyszczynski ₃₂ , Kaylin Ratner ₇ , Hank Rothgerber ₃₃ , James D Rounds ₇ , Mark Schaller ₃₄ , Roxane Cohen Silver _{35,

36,

37} , Barbara A Spellman ₃₈ , Nina Strohminger _{39,

40} , Janet K Swim ₈ , Felix Thoemmes _{7,

17} , Betul Urganci ₇ , Joseph A Vandello ₆ , Sarah Volz ₂₉ , Vivian Zayas ₁₇ , A Janet Tomiyama ₁

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Department of Psychology, New York University.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne.
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon.
Center for Translational Neuroscience, University of Oregon.
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida.
Department of Human Development, Cornell University.
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University.
Rock Ethics Institute, The Pennsylvania State University.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas.
Columbia Business School, Columbia University.
School of Psychology, University of Kent.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico.
Department of Psychology, Cornell University.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Department of Psychology, William Paterson University.
Department of Communication, University of California, Los Angeles.
Institute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles.
Department of Psychology, Brock University.
Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University.
Business School, University of Queensland.
Department of Psychology, Western University.
Department of Psychology, Boston College.
School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Department of Psychology, Tulane University.
Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles.
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.
Department of Psychology, Bellarmine University.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine.
Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine.
School of Law, University of Virginia.
Department of Legal Studies and Business Ethics, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania.
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.

The COVID-19 pandemic has extensively changed the state of psychological science from what research questions psychologists can ask to which methodologies psychologists can use to investigate them. In this article, we offer a perspective on how to optimize new research in the pandemic’s wake. Because this pandemic is inherently a social phenomenon—an event that hinges on human-to-human contact—we focus on socially relevant subfields of psychology. We highlight specific psychological phenomena that have likely shifted as a result of the pandemic and discuss theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations of conducting research on these phenomena. After this discussion, we evaluate metascientific issues that have been amplified by the pandemic. We aim to demonstrate how theoretically grounded views on the COVID-19 pandemic can help make psychological science stronger—not weaker—in its wake.

中文翻译：

COVID-19 后的心理科学：社会、方法论和元科学考虑

COVID-19 大流行极大地改变了心理科学的现状，从心理学家可以提出哪些研究问题，到心理学家可以使用哪些方法来研究这些问题。在本文中，我们提供了有关如何在大流行之后优化新研究的观点。因为这种流行病本质上是一种社会现象——一种取决于人与人之间接触的事件——我们关注与社会相关的心理学子领域。我们重点介绍可能因大流行而发生变化的特定心理现象，并讨论对这些现象进行研究的理论、方法和实践考虑。经过这次讨论，我们评估了因大流行而放大的元科学问题。

更新日期：2021-10-02

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文