The first decade of the 21st century recognised the growing salience of transnational or global governance as an analytical field of inquiry and as a normative project. In this introductory article, we argue that IPE offers a wider and deeper contextual understanding of the ‘global’ in a way that the scholarship of international relations, on the one hand, and that of international economics, on the other, have not done. IPE has been less strong in the context of global policy analysis that faut de mieux and, rather strangely, has been left largely to the economics discipline as other disciplines have slowly ceded the policy playing field to economics – at times with disastrous outcomes for policy. In light of these strengths and weaknesses of IPE as a framework for policy analysis, greater efforts at triangulating the insights of IPE and global public policy may help provide richer and more nuanced analyses of policy and politics.

中文翻译：

---

全球政策设计治理中对IPE和公共政策的需求

21 世纪的第一个十年认识到跨国或全球治理作为一个分析研究领域和一个规范项目的重要性日益突出。在这篇介绍性文章中，我们认为 IPE 提供了对“全球”的更广泛和更深入的语境理解，其方式一方面是国际关系研究，另一方面是国际经济学研究尚未做到的。IPE 在全球政策分析的背景下没有那么强大，而且很奇怪的是，随着其他学科逐渐将政策竞争环境让给经济学——有时会给政策带来灾难性的后果，IPE 主要留给了经济学学科。鉴于 IPE 作为政策分析框架的这些优势和劣势，