ABSTRACT

Is capture automatic or under our control? In a recent review, Luck and colleagues [Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21.] provide an important milestone for gauging our (attention researchers) progress with this question. While it may sometimes feel like we have made little progress, this article highlights major advances in our understanding of the tools/paradigms used to study capture, which culminated recently in a discovered role for suppression in regulating capture. Although valuable guidance for future research is offered, I argue that the article falls short in this area. The framework for integrating models of capture is too narrow and ignores the potential for stimuli to evoke multiple attentional effects.

摘要

捕获是自动的还是在我们的控制之下？在最近的评论中，Luck 及其同事 [Luck, SJ, Gaspelin, N., Folk, CL, Remington, RW, & Theeuwes, J. (2021)。解决注意力捕获争论的进展。视觉认知，29(1), 1-21.] 为衡量我们（注意力研究人员）在这个问题上的进展提供了一个重要的里程碑。虽然有时感觉我们没有取得什么进展，但本文强调了我们对用于研究捕获的工具/范式的理解方面的重大进展，这些进展在最近发现的抑制在调节捕获中的作用中达到了顶峰。尽管为未来的研究提供了宝贵的指导，但我认为这篇文章在这方面存在不足。整合捕获模型的框架太窄，忽略了刺激引起多重注意力效应的潜力。