ABSTRACT

As the debate about the automaticity of attentional capture has raged on over the years, knowledge of how selection functions has been accumulating in the literature. Luck et al. (2021) highlights emerging areas of consensus, including support for multiple mechanisms that influence attentional guidance. Here, I revisit the biased competition model of [Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205] to bring additional perspective. This aims to provide insight about open questions of “control” and to offer guidance in how to address other conceptual issues that hinder progress toward a better understanding of attentional functioning.

摘要

多年来，关于注意力捕获的自动性的争论一直在激烈进行，有关选择功能的知识在文献中不断积累。运气等。(2021) 强调了新出现的共识领域，包括支持影响注意力引导的多种机制。在这里，我重新审视了 [Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) 的有偏竞争模型。选择性视觉注意的神经机制。神经科学年度回顾，18（1），193-222。https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205] 带来更多视角。这旨在提供有关“控制”的开放性问题的见解，并为如何解决阻碍更好地理解注意力功能进展的其他概念问题提供指导。