States hold international human rights obligations to protect rights-holders from infringements by third parties and to fulfil access to rights. States also increasingly rely on businesses to provide essential human rights resources, including for housing, food, and healthcare. How these obligations apply where States rely on businesses has not been adequately conceptualised, particularly regarding the scope of business infringements in this context, and how the obligation to fulfil relates to market regulation. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has not directly addressed these questions, but recent General Comments develop ambitious regulatory obligations in this area. However, their methodology is questionable, often collapsing the distinction between obligations to protect and to fulfil. This article reconstructs the obligations to provide distinct content under each. It delineates State duties to protect from profiteering and to fulfil human rights through market regulation. It concludes by arguing that this reconstruction may challenge central aspects of globalised capitalism based on the human rights harm inherent therein.

中文翻译：

---

重构市场化时代保护和实现社会经济权利的国家义务

各国负有国际人权义务，以保护权利持有人免受第三方侵犯并实现权利的获取。各州也越来越依赖企业提供基本的人权资源，包括住房、食品和医疗保健。这些义务如何适用于国家依赖企业的情况尚未得到充分概念化，特别是关于在这种情况下企业侵权的范围，以及履行义务与市场监管的关系。经济、社会和文化权利委员会没有直接解决这些问题，但最近的一般性意见在该领域制定了雄心勃勃的监管义务。然而，他们的方法是有问题的，经常破坏保护义务和履行义务之间的区别。本文重构了在每项下提供不同内容的义务。它规定了国家防止暴利和通过市场监管实现人权的义务。它最后认为，这种重建可能会挑战基于其中固有的人权损害的全球化资本主义的核心方面。