This paper points out some problematic aspects of qualitative research based on interviews and uses examples from mental health. The narrative approach is explored while inquiring if the reality of life here is forced into the formula of a chronological story. The hermeneutic approach, in general, is also examined, and we ask if the reality of life in this scenario becomes caught up in a web of interpretations. Inspired by ideas from Bakhtin and phenomenology, we argue for interview-based research that stays with unresolvedness and constantly question the web of interpretations and narratives that determine our experiences. This also chimes with certain dialogical practices in mental health in which tolerance of uncertainty is the guiding principle. Concludingly, we suggest that interview-based research could be a practice of ‘un-resolving’ in which researchers, together with the participants, look for cracks, contradictions, and complexities to prevent the qualitative fallacies of well-organized meanings and well-composed stories.

本文指出了基于访谈的定性研究的一些问题方面，并使用了来自心理健康的例子。在探究这里的生活现实是否被迫进入按时间顺序排列的故事公式的同时，探索了叙事方法。一般来说，解释学的方法也会被检查，我们会问这种情况下的生活现实是否陷入了解释的网络中。受巴赫金和现象学思想的启发，我们主张以访谈为基础的研究，这种研究保持悬而未决的状态，并不断质疑决定我们经历的解释和叙述的网络。这也与心理健康领域的某些对话实践相吻合，其中以容忍不确定性为指导原则。最后，