Head-to-head comparison of contemporary heart failure risk scores,European Journal of Heart Failure

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Eur. J. Heart Fail. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Head-to-head comparison of contemporary heart failure risk scores
European Journal of Heart Failure ( IF 16.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-24 , DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2352
Pau Codina _{1,

2} , Josep Lupón _{1,

2,

3} , Andrea Borrellas ₁ , Giosafat Spitaleri ₁ , Germán Cediel _{1,

2} , Mar Domingo ₁ , Joanne Simpson ₄ , Wayne C Levy ₅ , Evelyn Santiago-Vacas _{1,

3} , Elisabet Zamora _{1,

2,

3} , David Buchaca ₆ , Isaac Subirana ₇ , Javier Santesmases _{1,

2} , Crisanto Diez-Quevedo ₁ , Maria I Troya ₁ , Maria Boldo ₁ , Salvador Altmir ₁ , Nuria Alonso ₁ , Beatriz González ₁ , Carmen Rivas ₁ , Julio Nuñez _{3,

8,

9} , John McMurray ₄ , Antoni Bayes-Genis _{1,

2,

3}

Affiliation

Several heart failure (HF) web-based risk scores are currently used in clinical practice. Currently, we lack head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of risk scores. This study aimed to assess correlation and mortality prediction performance of Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC-HF) risk score, which includes clinical variables + medications; Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), which includes clinical variables + treatments + analytes; PARADIGM Risk of Events and Death in the Contemporary Treatment of Heart Failure (PREDICT-HF) and Barcelona Bio-Heart Failure (BCN-Bio-HF) risk calculator, which also include biomarkers, like N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).

中文翻译：

当代心力衰竭风险评分的头对头比较

目前在临床实践中使用了几种基于网络的心力衰竭 (HF) 风险评分。目前，我们缺乏对风险评分准确性的直接比较。本研究旨在评估 Meta 分析全球组在慢性心力衰竭 (MAGGIC-HF) 风险评分中的相关性和死亡率预测性能，其中包括临床变量 + 药物；西雅图心力衰竭模型 (SHFM)，包括临床变量 + 治疗 + 分析物；PARADIGM 现代心力衰竭治疗中的事件和死亡风险 (PREDICT-HF) 和巴塞罗那生物心力衰竭 (BCN-Bio-HF) 风险计算器，其中还包括生物标志物，如 N 端 B 型利钠肽前体 ( NT-proBNP)。

更新日期：2021-09-24

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊最新论文本刊介绍/投稿指南11