A person's entitlement to workplace rights and protections under English law is conditional on their relationship falling within the legal category of employment, by virtue of them having the requisite status. The employment status of individuals performing on-demand work via digital platforms is particularly contentious and has been a focal point for debate in recent years. The Supreme Court decision in Uber BV v Aslam represents a ground-breaking judgment on this issue, which has radical implications for the correct approach to determining employment status more generally. It is argued here that, while leaving some important questions unanswered, the purposive and relational approach to employment status developed by the Supreme Court in Uber BV v Aslam is to be welcomed, and that this new approach has far-reaching consequences for the future of the legal category of employment.

中文翻译：

---

就业的未来：目的性解释和优步之后合同的作用

一个人在英国法律下享有工作场所权利和保护的权利取决于他们的关系是否属于合法的雇佣类别，因为他们具有必要的身份。通过数字平台执行按需工作的个人的就业状况特别有争议，近年来一直是争论的焦点。最高法院在Uber BV诉Aslam案中的判决代表了对该问题的开创性判决，这对更普遍地确定就业状况的正确方法具有根本意义。这里有人认为，尽管一些重要问题没有得到解答，但最高法院在Uber BV vAslam是值得欢迎的，而且这种新方法对就业法律类别的未来具有深远的影响。