Contemporary models of welfare capitalism have frequently been critiqued about their fit-for-purpose in provisioning for people’s basic needs including care, and longer-term ecological sustainability. The Covid-19 pandemic has also exposed the need for better institutions and a new welfare architecture. We argue a post-productivist eco-social state can deliver sustainable well-being and meet basic needs. Arguing Universal Basic Services are an essential building block and prerequisite for a de-commodified welfare state, we focus on examining the form of income support that might best complement UBS. The article develops, from the perspective of feminist arguments and the capabilities approach, a case for Participation Income. This, we argue, can be aligned with targeted policy goals, particularly reward for and redistribution of human and ecological care or reproduction and other forms of socially valued participation. It may also, in the short term, be more administratively practical and politically feasible than universal basic income.

当代福利资本主义模式经常因其在满足人们的基本需求（包括护理）和长期生态可持续性方面的适用性而受到批评。Covid-19 大流行还暴露了对更好的机构和新的福利架构的需求。我们认为后生产主义生态社会国家可以提供可持续的福祉并满足基本需求。争论普遍基本服务是去商品化福利国家的重要组成部分和先决条件，我们专注于研究可能最好地补充瑞银的收入支持形式。本文从女权主义论点和能力方法的角度发展了参与收入的案例。我们认为，这可以与有针对性的政策目标保持一致，特别是奖励和重新分配人类和生态关怀或繁殖以及其他形式的具有社会价值的参与。在短期内，它也可能比全民基本收入在行政上和政治上更可行。