Volume 65, no. 7, e02587-20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02587-20. In Table 4, a single methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolate inhibited by 0.12 μg/ml of exebacase is presented, and the remaining 148 isolates tested have an exebacase MIC range of 0.25 to 1 μg/ml. Further investigation of the isolate with an exebacase MIC of 0.12 μg/ml to confirm bacterial identification (by MALDI-TOF) and MIC revealed the isolate to be Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Based on this finding, the authors wish to correct Table 4 and the corresponding text that refers to the S. aureus MIC data accordingly. With these corrections, the interpretation and conclusions of the article remain the same.

中文翻译：

---

Oh 等人的更正，“用于 Exebacase 敏感性测试的肉汤微量稀释方法的开发”

第 65 卷，没有。7、e02587-20，2021，https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02587-20。在表 4 中，呈现了一种被 0.12 μg/ml exebacase 抑制的对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株，其余 148 个测试的分离株的 exebacase MIC 范围为 0.25 至 1 μg/ml。进一步研究 exebacase MIC 为 0.12 μg/ml 的分离株以确认细菌鉴定（通过 MALDI-TOF）和 MIC 显示该分离株为假中间葡萄球菌。基于这一发现，作者希望相应地更正表 4 和引用金黄色葡萄球菌 MIC 数据的相应文本。通过这些更正，文章的解释和结论保持不变。