当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Ambient air pollution and COVID-19 risk: Evidence from 35 observational studies
Environmental Research ( IF 7.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-15 , DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112065
Si-Tian Zang 1 , Jie Luan 1 , Ling Li 2 , Hui-Xin Yu 1 , Qi-Jun Wu 1 , Qing Chang 1 , Yu-Hong Zhao 3
Affiliation  

Background and aims

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is severely threatening and challenging public health worldwide. Epidemiological studies focused on the influence of outdoor air pollution (AP) on COVID-19 risk have produced inconsistent conclusions. We aimed to quantitatively explore this association using a meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched for studies related to outdoor AP and COVID-19 risk in the Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. No language restriction was utilized. The search date entries were up to August 13, 2021. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained with random-/fixed-effects models. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021244656.

Results

A total of 35 articles were eligible for the meta-analysis. For long-term exposure to AP, COVID-19 incidence was positively associated with 1 μg/m3 increase in nitrogen dioxide (NO2; effect size = 1.042, 95% CI 1.017–1.068), particulate matter with diameter <2.5 μm (PM2.5; effect size = 1.056, 95% CI 1.039–1.072), and sulfur dioxide (SO2; effect size = 1.071, 95% CI 1.002–1.145). The COVID-19 mortality was positively associated with 1 μg/m3 increase in nitrogen dioxide (NO2; effect size = 1.034, 95% CI 1.006–1.063), PM2.5 (effect size = 1.047, 95% CI 1.025–1.1071). For short-term exposure to air pollutants, COVID-19 incidence was positively associated with 1 unit increase in air quality index (effect size = 1.001, 95% CI 1.001–1.002), 1 μg/m3 increase NO2 (effect size = 1.014, 95% CI 1.011–1.016), particulate matter with diameter <10 μm (PM10; effect size = 1.005, 95% CI 1.003–1.008), PM2.5 (effect size = 1.003, 95% CI 1.002–1.004), and SO2 (effect size = 1.015, 95% CI 1.007–1.023).

Conclusions

Outdoor air pollutants are detrimental factors to COVID-19 outcomes. Measurements beneficial to reducing pollutant levels might also reduce the burden of the pandemic.



中文翻译:


环境空气污染和 COVID-19 风险:来自 35 项观察性研究的证据


 背景和目标


2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行正在严重威胁和挑战全世界的公共卫生。侧重于室外空气污染 (AP) 对 COVID-19 风险影响的流行病学研究得出了不一致的结论。我们的目的是使用荟萃分析来定量探索这种关联。

 方法


我们在 Embase、PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中检索了与户外 AP 和 COVID-19 风险相关的研究。没有使用语言限制。搜索日期条目截至 2021 年 8 月 13 日。通过随机/固定效应模型获得汇总估计值和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。 PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021244656。

 结果


共有 35 篇文章符合荟萃分析的条件。对于长期暴露于 AP 的情况,COVID-19 发病率与二氧化氮(NO 2 ;效应大小 = 1.042,95% CI 1.017–1.068)、直径为 <2.5 的颗粒物增加 1 μg/m 3呈正相关μm(PM 2.5 ;效应大小 = 1.056,95% CI 1.039–1.072)和二氧化硫(SO 2 ;效应大小 = 1.071,95% CI 1.002–1.145)。 COVID-19死亡率与二氧化氮(NO 2 ;效应大小 = 1.034,95% CI 1.006–1.063)、PM 2.5 (效应大小 = 1.047,95% CI 1.025–1.1071)增加呈正相关。对于短期暴露于空气污染物的情况,COVID-19 发病率与空气质量指数增加 1 个单位呈正相关(效应大小 = 1.001,95% CI 1.001–1.002),NO 2增加 1 μg/m 3 (效应大小 = 1.014,95% CI 1.011–1.016),直径为 <10 μm 的颗粒物(PM 10 ;效应大小 = 1.005,95% CI 1.003–1.008),PM 2.5 (效应大小 = 1.003,95% CI 1.002–1.004),和 SO 2 (效应量 = 1.015,95% CI 1.007–1.023)。

 结论


室外空气污染物是 COVID-19 结果的不利因素。有利于降低污染物水平的措施也可能减轻大流行的负担。

更新日期:2021-09-20
down
wechat
bug