ABSTRACT

In this article, we examine scholarly analyses of justice and develop a framework that can help assess the claims from the parties in the Russian state-led doping scandal, including, but not limited to, Russian athletes, non-Russian athletes, the World Anti-Doping Agency, and sport governing bodies. The two key components of this justice framework are pluralism and relationality/contextuality. We argue that a justice framework built upon these elements better captures the nature of justice. We conclude that no party in the Russian state-led doping case has exclusive access to justice. Rather, all the parties have legitimate calls for justice against one another. Thus, the administration of justice will fail to serve justice, in its different meanings, for all parties.

摘要

在本文中，我们研究了对正义的学术分析，并制定了一个框架，可以帮助评估俄罗斯国家主导的兴奋剂丑闻中各方的主张，包括但不限于俄罗斯运动员、非俄罗斯运动员、世界反兴奋剂-兴奋剂机构和体育管理机构。这个正义框架的两个关键组成部分是多元化和关系/语境。我们认为，建立在这些要素之上的正义框架更能体现正义的本质。我们得出的结论是，俄罗斯国家主导的兴奋剂案件中，没有任何一方可以独家诉诸司法。相反，所有当事方都有正当的要求对彼此伸张正义的呼声。因此，司法行政将无法为所有各方服务于不同含义的正义。