Many parts of the contemporary philosophical debate have been built on the radicalization of conclusions derived from the acceptance of a certain set of classical dichotomies. It also discusses how pragmatism and abduction are currently presented to solve the problems arising from these dichotomies. For this reason, the efforts of this article have been directed to analyze the impact of this fact on the philosophy of science and logic. The starting point is that accepting abduction implies, in many ways, accepting the foundations of pragmatism. Also, that the analysis of such problems from pragmatism and the particular use of abduction dissolve the dichotomies and, with it, also modify the philosophical problems related to them. Therefore, I propose to understand abduction as the right conceptual device to review the problems and debates of the twentieth century’s epistemology from a pragmatic perspective. In doing so, the aim is to propose that the current use of abduction in contemporary debates may imply a change of the philosophical perspective.

当代哲学辩论的许多部分都建立在从接受某些经典二分法中得出的结论的激进化基础上。它还讨论了当前如何提出实用主义和绑架来解决由这些二分法引起的问题。为此，本文致力于分析这一事实对科学哲学和逻辑哲学的影响。起点是接受绑架在许多方面意味着接受实用主义的基础。此外，从实用主义和溯因的特殊用途对此类问题的分析消除了二分法，并随之修改了与它们相关的哲学问题。所以，我建议将溯因理解为从实用的角度回顾 20 世纪认识论的问题和争论的正确概念工具。这样做的目的是提出当前在当代辩论中使用绑架可能意味着哲学观点的改变。