当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Ann. Intern. Med.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
In suspected COVID-19, RT-PCR with nasal plus throat swabs has 97% sensitivity vs. nasopharyngeal swabs
Annals of Internal Medicine ( IF 19.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-07 , DOI: 10.7326/acpj202109210-107 Dennis G Maki 1
中文翻译:
在疑似 COVID-19 中,鼻加咽拭子的 RT-PCR 与鼻咽拭子相比具有 97% 的敏感性
更新日期:2021-09-07
Annals of Internal Medicine ( IF 19.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-07 , DOI: 10.7326/acpj202109210-107 Dennis G Maki 1
Affiliation
Source Citation
Tsang NN, So HC, Ng KY, et al. Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. [Epub ahead of print.] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33857405
Clinical Impact Ratings
GIM/FP/GP:
Emergency Med:
Hospitalists:
Infectious Disease:
Public Health:
中文翻译:
在疑似 COVID-19 中,鼻加咽拭子的 RT-PCR 与鼻咽拭子相比具有 97% 的敏感性
来源引用
Tsang NN、So HC、Ng KY 等。SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测不同采样方法的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。柳叶刀感染 Dis。2021. [Epub 印刷前。] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33857405
临床影响评级
GIM/FP/GP:
紧急医疗:
住院医师:
传染病:
公共卫生: