当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Virol. Methods › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay and RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
Journal of Virological Methods ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-06 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114276
Daniele Di Carlo 1 , Laura Mazzuti 1 , Ilaria Sciandra 1 , Giuliana Guerrizio 1 , Giuseppe Oliveto 1 , Rodolfo J Riveros Cabral 1 , Maria Antonella Zingaropoli 2 , Ombretta Turriziani 1
Affiliation  

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of FTD SARS-CoV-2 compared to the RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0. The analysis of 100 nasopharyngeal swabs showed an overall agreement of 88 %. The positive percentage agreement was 85.6 % and the negative percentage agreement was 91 %. In conclusion we observed a substantial agreement among the two methods, with discrepancies mainly observed in specimens with relatively low amount of viral RNA.



中文翻译:

FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay 和 RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的比较

该研究的目的是评估 FTD SARS-CoV-2 与 RealStar RT-PCR 试剂盒 1.0 相比的临床性能。对 100 份鼻咽拭子的分析表明,总体一致性为 88%。正百分比一致性为 85.6%,负百分比一致性为 91%。总之,我们观察到两种方法之间的基本一致,差异主要在病毒 RNA 量相对较低的样本中观察到。

更新日期:2021-09-10
down
wechat
bug