Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem among college students and many students have difficulty identifying unhealthy and abusive behaviors. The aims of this mixed methods study are to: (a) create an inclusive tool that illustrates the power and control experiences of a diverse group of young adult college students, (b) ensure a broad scope of tactics are illustrated (related to technology and different types of relationships), and (c) measure the experience of these tactics, including how IPV knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy are influenced by a more inclusive tool. In Phase I, semi-structured interviews were conducted with students (n = 33) and staff (n = 10) at campus sexual assault centers at the three University of Michigan (UM) campuses to explore power and control tactics utilized by perpetrators on college campuses. Content analysis revealed 13 categories of tactics in college relationships. A draft tool was created and assessed for accuracy using cognitive interviews with students (n = 20) from all three campuses in Phase II. Cognitive interviews resulted in the following changes to the final tool: (a) new presentation of the Socioecological Model, (b) identification of substance use as a facilitator for multiple forms of violence, and (c) edits to tactic descriptions. In Phase III, 250 students at UM–Ann Arbor participated in a quasi-experimental evaluation in which 133 interacted with the tool and 117 received access to usual care (campus sexual misconduct policy). Both groups answered survey questions about IPV knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and experiences at baseline, and after one month and five months. Among all college participants in Phase III, 33.5% had experienced lifetime IPV and 25.2% had experienced IPV in the past year. There were no significant differences among IPV knowledge, attitudes, or self-efficacy by group. The Dynamics of Interpersonal Coercion Among College Students tool was created by incorporating current tactics utilized among a diverse college population.

亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 是大学生中的一个重大公共卫生问题，许多学生难以识别不健康和虐待行为。这种混合方法研究的目的是：(a) 创建一个包容性工具来说明不同的年轻成人大学生群体的权力和控制经验，(b) 确保说明广泛的策略（与技术和不同类型的关系），以及 (c) 衡量这些策略的经验，包括 IPV 知识、态度和自我效能如何受到更具包容性的工具的影响。在第一阶段，对密歇根大学 (UM) 三个校区的校园性侵犯中心的学生 (n = 33) 和工作人员 (n = 10) 进行了半结构化访谈，以探索犯罪者在大学校园内使用的权力和控制策略。内容分析揭示了大学关系中的 13 种策略。使用对来自第二阶段所有三个校区的学生 (n = 20) 的认知访谈，创建并评估了工具草案的准确性。认知访谈导致最终工具发生以下变化：(a) 社会生态学模型的新介绍，(b) 将物质使用确定为多种形式暴力的促进者，以及 (c) 对策略描述的编辑。在第三阶段，密歇根大学安娜堡分校的 250 名学生参加了一项准实验评估，其中 133 人与该工具进行了互动，117 人获得了常规护理（校园性行为不端政策）。两组都回答了关于 IPV 知识、态度、自我效能和基线经验以及一个月和五个月后的调查问题。在第三阶段的所有大学生参与者中，33.5% 的人经历过终生 IPV，25.2% 的人在过去一年中经历过 IPV。IPV 知识、态度或自我效能感在各组之间没有显着差异。大学生人际胁迫的动态工具是通过结合当前在不同大学生群体中使用的策略而创建的。自我效能感，以及基线时以及一个月和五个月后的经验。在第三阶段的所有大学生参与者中，33.5% 的人经历过终生 IPV，25.2% 的人在过去一年中经历过 IPV。IPV 知识、态度或自我效能感在各组之间没有显着差异。大学生人际胁迫的动态工具是通过结合当前在不同大学生群体中使用的策略而创建的。自我效能感，以及基线时以及一个月和五个月后的经验。在第三阶段的所有大学生参与者中，33.5% 的人经历过终生 IPV，25.2% 的人在过去一年中经历过 IPV。IPV 知识、态度或自我效能感在各组之间没有显着差异。大学生人际胁迫的动态工具是通过结合当前在不同大学生群体中使用的策略而创建的。