当前位置: X-MOL 学术Age Ageing › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Patients’ preferred place of death: patients are willing to consider their preferences, but someone has to ask them
Age and Ageing ( IF 6.0 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-04 , DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab176
Iris van Doorne 1 , Marjon van Rijn 1, 2, 3 , Sjoerd M Dofferhoff 1 , Dick L Willems 4 , Bianca M Buurman 1, 2, 3
Affiliation  

Background end-of-life care is not always in line with end-of-life preferences, so patients do not always die at their preferred place of death (PPD). This study aims to identify factors associated with patients’ PPD and changes in PPD. Methods we prospectively collected data on PPD at four time points within 6 months from 230 acutely hospitalised older patients who were part of the control group in a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. Associations between patient characteristics and preferences were calculated using multivariable (multinomial) logistic regression analysis. Results the mean age of participants was 80.7 years. 47.8% of the patients had no PPD at hospital admission. Patients previously admitted to hospital preferred to die at home (home versus no preference: odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–4.92; home versus healthcare facility: OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.15–9.16). Patients with more chronic diseases preferred the healthcare facility as their PPD (healthcare facility versus no preference: OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09–1.61; healthcare facility versus home: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00–1.47). 32 of 65 patients changed their preference during follow-up, and most of these had no PPD at hospital admission (home versus no preference: OR 0.005, 95% CI ≤0.001–0.095) and poorer self-rated well-being (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.07–3.08). Conclusions almost half of the patients had no PPD at baseline. Previous hospital admission, having more chronic diseases and living alone are associated with having a PPD. Introducing PPD could make older people aware of PPD and facilitate optimal palliative care.

中文翻译:

患者的首选死亡地点:患者愿意考虑自己的喜好,但有人要问他们

背景临终关怀并不总是符合临终偏好,因此患者并不总是在他们首选的死亡地点 (PPD) 死亡。本研究旨在确定与患者 PPD 和 PPD 变化相关的因素。方法 我们在阶梯楔形随机对照试验中前瞻性地收集了 230 名急性住院老年患者的 6 个月内四个时间点的 PPD 数据,这些患者是对照组的一部分。使用多变量(多项)逻辑回归分析计算患者特征和偏好之间的关联。结果 参与者的平均年龄为 80.7 岁。47.8%的患者入院时没有PPD。先前入院的患者更愿意在家中死去(在家与无偏好:优势比 [OR] 2.38,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.15–4.92;家庭与医疗机构:OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.15–9.16)。患有更多慢性病的患者更喜欢医疗机构作为他们的 PPD(医疗机构与无偏好:OR 1.33,95% CI 1.09–1.61;医疗机构与家庭:OR 1.21,95% CI 1.00–1.47)。65 名患者中有 32 名在随访期间改变了他们的偏好,其中大多数在入院时没有 PPD(在家与无偏好:OR 0.005,95% CI ≤0.001-0.095)并且自评幸福感较差(OR 1.82 , 95% CI 1.07–3.08)。结论 几乎一半的患者在基线时没有 PPD。以前住院、患有更多慢性病和独居与 PPD 相关。引入 PPD 可以使老年人了解 PPD 并促进最佳姑息治疗。患有更多慢性病的患者更喜欢医疗机构作为他们的 PPD(医疗机构与无偏好:OR 1.33,95% CI 1.09–1.61;医疗机构与家庭:OR 1.21,95% CI 1.00–1.47)。65 名患者中有 32 名在随访期间改变了他们的偏好,其中大多数在入院时没有 PPD(在家与无偏好:OR 0.005,95% CI ≤0.001-0.095)并且自评幸福感较差(OR 1.82 , 95% CI 1.07–3.08)。结论 几乎一半的患者在基线时没有 PPD。以前住院、患有更多慢性病和独居与 PPD 相关。引入 PPD 可以使老年人了解 PPD 并促进最佳姑息治疗。患有更多慢性病的患者更喜欢医疗机构作为他们的 PPD(医疗机构与无偏好:OR 1.33,95% CI 1.09–1.61;医疗机构与家庭:OR 1.21,95% CI 1.00–1.47)。65 名患者中有 32 名在随访期间改变了他们的偏好,其中大多数在入院时没有 PPD(在家与无偏好:OR 0.005,95% CI ≤0.001-0.095)并且自评幸福感较差(OR 1.82 , 95% CI 1.07–3.08)。结论 几乎一半的患者在基线时没有 PPD。以前住院、患有更多慢性病和独居与 PPD 相关。引入 PPD 可以使老年人了解 PPD 并促进最佳姑息治疗。医疗机构与家庭:OR 1.21,95% CI 1.00–1.47)。65 名患者中有 32 名在随访期间改变了他们的偏好,其中大多数在入院时没有 PPD(在家与无偏好:OR 0.005,95% CI ≤0.001-0.095)并且自评幸福感较差(OR 1.82 , 95% CI 1.07–3.08)。结论 几乎一半的患者在基线时没有 PPD。以前住院、患有更多慢性病和独居与 PPD 相关。引入 PPD 可以使老年人了解 PPD 并促进最佳姑息治疗。医疗机构与家庭:OR 1.21,95% CI 1.00–1.47)。65 名患者中有 32 名在随访期间改变了他们的偏好,其中大多数在入院时没有 PPD(在家与无偏好:OR 0.005,95% CI ≤0.001-0.095)并且自评幸福感较差(OR 1.82 , 95% CI 1.07–3.08)。结论 几乎一半的患者在基线时没有 PPD。以前住院、患有更多慢性病和独居与 PPD 相关。引入 PPD 可以使老年人了解 PPD 并促进最佳姑息治疗。结论 几乎一半的患者在基线时没有 PPD。以前住院、患有更多慢性病和独居与 PPD 相关。引入 PPD 可以使老年人了解 PPD 并促进最佳姑息治疗。结论 几乎一半的患者在基线时没有 PPD。以前住院、患有更多慢性病和独居与 PPD 相关。引入 PPD 可以使老年人了解 PPD 并促进最佳姑息治疗。
更新日期:2021-08-04
down
wechat
bug