Studies of implementation of evidence-based supervision policies and procedures often report minimal to moderate adherence to evidence-based models. The few studies that exist examine the degree to which characteristics of probation officers, individuals on supervision, and supervision processes have an impact on rearrest (outcomes). Using administrative data on 7,326 probationers and surveys from 161 probation officers employed by five agencies, hierarchical linear models were used to identify the features of supervision processes that are most important to reduce recidivism. The findings clarify that no one evidence-based supervision feature (i.e., a validated risk and need assessment tool, case planning, treatment, compliance management, etc.) can achieve recidivism reductions. The best results can be achieved by using all features, although a risk-based case management approach that prioritizes employment and/or reducing the criminogenic needs creates similar outcomes. This article discusses the implications of prioritizing which supervision processes are used to impact positive supervision outcomes.

对循证监管政策和程序实施的研究通常报告对循证模型的遵守程度最低到中等。现有的少数研究调查了缓刑官员的特征、受监督的个人和监督过程对重新逮捕（结果）的影响程度。使用 7,326 名缓刑人员的行政数据和来自 5 个机构雇用的 161 名缓刑官员的调查，使用分层线性模型来确定对减少累犯最重要的监督过程的特征。调查结果阐明，没有一个循证监督功能（即经过验证的风险和需求评估工具、案例规划、治疗、合规管理等）可以减少再犯。使用所有功能可以获得最好的结果，尽管优先考虑就业和/或减少犯罪需求的基于风险的案件管理方法会产生类似的结果。本文讨论了优先考虑使用哪些监管流程来影响积极监管结果的含义。