This article addresses the position of Turkish law regarding parental equality, with a focus on day-to-day childcare responsibility. It discusses whether the current legal landscape is consistent with the aim of relieving mothers from a disproportionate share of childcare. The article first explains the general legal framework of gender equality in Turkey before offering closer insight into two fields that help understand whether parental equality is embraced or rejected: measures regarding work–life balance and the organisation of child–parent relationships after divorce. The article analyses specific legal measures impacting the delegation of childcare duties by mothers, including leave and flexible work policies and childcare services. It argues that the legal framework concerning working mothers conveys contradictory messages that reinforce the gendered character of childcare duties. Based on recent case law concerning divorced mothers, the article underlines the potential for the evolution towards parental equality but acknowledges the limited impact of such developments due to the attachment to the maternal preference rule. The article concludes that, despite good intentions and legal reforms favouring gender equality, Turkish law is still devoid of a comprehensive policy regarding parental equality and does not offer incentives for fathers to participate in daily childcare.

中文翻译：

---

土耳其的父母平等：通过对在职母亲和离婚母亲的法律待遇了解性别角色

本文阐述了土耳其法律关于父母平等的立场，重点关注日常育儿责任。它讨论了当前的法律环境是否符合让母亲免于过度承担儿童保育责任的目标。本文首先解释了土耳其性别平等的一般法律框架，然后对有助于理解父母平等是否被接受或拒绝的两个领域提供更深入的了解：关于工作与生活平衡的措施以及离婚后子女与父母关系的组织。本文分析了影响母亲托儿职责下放的具体法律措施，包括休假和灵活工作政策以及托儿服务。它认为，关于职业母亲的法律框架传达了相互矛盾的信息，强化了育儿职责的性别特征。基于最近关于离婚母亲的判例法，文章强调了向父母平等发展的潜力，但承认由于对母亲偏好规则的依恋，这种发展的影响有限。文章的结论是，尽管有良好的意愿和有利于性别平等的法律改革，但土耳其法律仍然缺乏关于父母平等的全面政策，也没有为父亲提供参与日常育儿的激励措施。文章强调了向父母平等发展的潜力，但承认由于对母亲偏好规则的依恋，这种发展的影响有限。文章的结论是，尽管有良好的意愿和有利于性别平等的法律改革，但土耳其法律仍然缺乏关于父母平等的全面政策，也没有为父亲提供参与日常育儿的激励措施。文章强调了向父母平等发展的潜力，但承认由于对母亲偏好规则的依恋，这种发展的影响有限。文章的结论是，尽管有良好的意愿和有利于性别平等的法律改革，但土耳其法律仍然缺乏关于父母平等的全面政策，也没有为父亲提供参与日常育儿的激励措施。