Effective Mentoring and the Problem of Assessing Quality in Science,Helvetica Chimica Acta

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Helv. Chimica Acta › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Effective Mentoring and the Problem of Assessing Quality in Science
Helvetica Chimica Acta ( IF 1.5 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-02 , DOI: 10.1002/hlca.202100124
Manfred T. Reetz _{1,

2}

Affiliation

In this short essay, I re-emphasize the inter-relationship between mentoring doctoral students or postdocs and the never ending problem of assessing the quality of scientific outputs. It includes the plea to mentees and mentors not to employ an overblown language in papers, posters and lectures, which constitute a gross exaggeration of the true state of affairs. Doubt is also cast on the present use of Hirsch-factors and other bibliometric data as well as certain social media claiming to be effective in assessing scientific quality.

中文翻译：

有效指导和评估科学质量的问题

在这篇短文中，我再次强调了指导博士生或博士后与评估科学产出质量的永无止境的问题之间的相互关系。它包括恳求学员和导师不要在论文、海报和讲座中使用夸大其词的语言，这些语言构成对真实情况的严重夸大。对Hirsch因子和其他文献计量数据以及某些声称在评估科学质量方面有效的社交媒体的当前使用也存在疑问。

更新日期：2021-10-19

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文本刊介绍/投稿指南11