Increasing use of ocean space, through land or sea industries, has over time caused aggregated ecological problems as well as state jurisdictional issues thus leading to the development of regimes for regulating and reversing such effects and disputes. In this context, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) constitutes a fundamental instrument for the governance of the marine environment and its resources. Currently, the urgent need to resolve depletion of ocean resources has led us to gradually include the principles of sustainable development in the ocean governance spectrum. Amid growing international efforts to preserve oceans, the United Nations (UNs) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) introduced a new form of ocean governance by integrating seasonable sustainability perspectives to the hitherto established ocean governance status quo. This paper aims to explore Norway’s ocean governance regime contributing thus to the discourse of country’s transition and shaping to address latest sustainability challenges. To do so, a socio-legal scholarship is adopted. Drawing on hypotheses from extensive review and contextual analysis by a total of 158 Norwegian government sources and literature, the article identified significant adjustments to the Norwegian ocean governance model, as well as weaknesses that need further intervention.

随着时间的推移，通过陆地或海洋工业增加对海洋空间的利用已经引起了生态问题和国家管辖权问题，从而导致了监管和扭转此类影响和争端的制度的发展。在此背景下，《联合国海洋法公约》（UNCLOS）构成了管理海洋环境及其资源的基本文书。当前，解决海洋资源枯竭问题的迫切需要，促使我们逐步将可持续发展原则纳入海洋治理范畴。随着保护海洋的国际努力不断增加，联合国 (UN) 可持续发展目标 (SDG) 引入了一种新的海洋治理形式，将适时的可持续性观点与迄今确立的海洋治理现状相结合。本文旨在探讨挪威的海洋治理制度，从而有助于讨论国家转型和塑造以应对最新的可持续发展挑战。为此，采用了社会法律奖学金。根据对总共 158 个挪威政府来源和文献的广泛审查和背景分析的假设，本文确定了挪威海洋治理模式的重大调整，以及需要进一步干预的弱点。本文旨在探讨挪威的海洋治理制度，从而有助于讨论国家转型和塑造以应对最新的可持续发展挑战。为此，采用了社会法律奖学金。根据对总共 158 个挪威政府来源和文献的广泛审查和背景分析的假设，本文确定了挪威海洋治理模式的重大调整，以及需要进一步干预的弱点。本文旨在探讨挪威的海洋治理制度，从而有助于讨论国家转型和塑造以应对最新的可持续发展挑战。为此，采用了社会法律奖学金。根据对总共 158 个挪威政府来源和文献的广泛审查和背景分析的假设，本文确定了挪威海洋治理模式的重大调整，以及需要进一步干预的弱点。