当前位置: X-MOL 学术Learned Publishing › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers
Learned Publishing ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-31 , DOI: 10.1002/leap.1420
Anthony F. Jorm 1
Affiliation  

  • It has become increasingly difficult for journal editors to find reviewers, while researchers are receiving increasing requests to be reviewers.
  • Publons is used by some editors to identify potential reviewers, but may be a source of a high volume of sometimes poorly targeted requests.
  • By systematically turning on and off his availability to be a reviewer in Publons, the author was able to show that it is a major source of the large number and sometimes inappropriate requests he received.
  • Automatically generated reviewer suggestions need to be intelligently vetted by editors to avoid overwhelming potential reviewers.
  • The academic publishing industry could usefully develop professional standards of good practice for reviewer selection.


中文翻译:

Publons 作为大量、针对性不强的审稿人请求的来源:出版商需要更好的实践标准

  • 期刊编辑找到审稿人变得越来越困难,而研究人员收到越来越多的审稿人要求。
  • 一些编辑使用 Publons 来识别潜在的审稿人,但可能是大量有时针对性不强的请求的来源。
  • 通过系统地打开和关闭他是否可以成为 Publons 的审稿人,作者能够证明这是他收到的大量请求的主要来源,有时甚至是不恰当的请求。
  • 自动生成的审稿人建议需要由编辑进行智能审查,以避免压倒潜在审稿人。
  • 学术出版业可以为审稿人选择制定良好实践的专业标准。
更新日期:2021-08-31
down
wechat
bug