ABSTRACT

This research examines the origins of Korean modern architecture within the context of cultural encounters between the East and West in terms of modernity, and in comparison with the origins of modern Western architecture. This research examines the works of two pioneering and representative Korean modern architects: Gilryong Park (朴吉龍, 1898–1943) and Dongjin Park (朴東鎭, 1899–1981), who actively designed architecture during the Japanese colonial period (1910–1945). When these two representative Korean modern architects led the movements toward modernity, adapting traditional architecture was a key factor in their philosophy of modern architecture. However, they had different approaches to inheriting tradition and interpreting modernity. Considering these two architects as case studies, this research demonstrates that early modernism in Korean architecture was entangled with and struggled between Western modernism, Japanized modernism, and traditional Korean architecture. This research provides a significant and unique case study of the cultural encounters between Korean, Japanese, and Western architecture in the early 20^th century. This research enables the discovery of the identity of early Korean modern architecture through its evolution from tradition to modernism by considering the social and cultural contexts and comparing it with modern Western architecture.

摘要

本研究在东西方文化交汇的背景下，从现代性的角度审视韩国现代建筑的起源，并与现代西方建筑的起源进行比较。本研究考察了两位具有开创性和代表性的韩国现代建筑师的作品：吉龙公园（朴吉龙，1898-1943）和东津公园（朴东鎭，1899-1981），他们在日本殖民时期（1910-1945）积极设计建筑. 当这两位具有代表性的韩国现代建筑师引领现代运动时，适应传统建筑是他们现代建筑哲学的关键因素。然而，他们在继承传统和诠释现代性方面有不同的做法。将这两位建筑师作为案例研究，这项研究表明，韩国建筑中的早期现代主义与西方现代主义、日本化现代主义和韩国传统建筑之间纠缠不清。这项研究为 20 世纪初韩国、日本和西方建筑之间的文化相遇提供了一个重要而独特的案例研究^世纪。这项研究通过考虑社会和文化背景并将其与现代西方建筑进行比较，通过其从传统到现代主义的演变来发现早期韩国现代建筑的身份。