This article presents the case of Turkey within the framework of this special issue entitled “On Islamist Parties and the Inclusion-Moderation Hypothesis”. I argue that rather than a distinction between the concepts of “tactical” and “ideological” moderation that the literature talks about, a distinction between the concepts of an “inclusionary-populist” and “moderate Islamist” party could provide a more useful insight over the role of Islamist and post-Islamist parties in democratization and de-democratization processes. Through a re-analysis of the secondary literature and a content analysis of 196 newspaper columns written by three pro-democracy intellectuals, I label the akp’s transition period from moderate-Islamism toward authoritarianism as its inclusionary populist phase. I show that in contexts marked by deep ideological divisions and unconsolidated democratic institutions, a shift in party identity from moderate-Islamism toward inclusionary populism can be taken as the early signal of an unfolding process of autocratization.

本文在题为“伊斯兰政党和包容性温和假说”的特刊框架内介绍了土耳其的案例。我认为，区分“包容民粹主义”和“温和伊斯兰主义”政党的概念，而不是区分文献中讨论的“战术”和“意识形态”温和主义概念，可以提供更有用的见解。伊斯兰主义和后伊斯兰主义政党在民主化和去民主化进程中的作用。通过对二手文献的重新分析和对三位民主知识分子撰写的196篇报纸专栏的内容分析，我将正义与发展党从温和伊斯兰主义向威权主义的过渡时期标记为包容性民粹主义阶段。我表明，在以深刻的意识形态分歧和不巩固的民主机构为标志的背景下，政党身份从温和伊斯兰主义向包容性民粹主义的转变可以被视为专制化进程展开的早期信号。