Drawing from resilience theory, this study explored subgroups of undocumented college students (UCS) based on their patterns of protection-oriented family communication and strengths-based psychological coping. Using survey data from 237 UCS, latent profile analyses revealed three subgroups. Safe optimistic copers reported occasional documentation-seeking and know-your-rights communication, but higher means in prevention and right path communication, as well as optimistic coping. Comprehensive copers scored moderately high in all types of protection-oriented communication and psychological coping. Strengths-based psychological copers infrequently engaged in protection-oriented communication, yet they scored moderately to moderately high in positive psychological coping. Compared to the other two profiles, safe optimistic copers reported the worst wellbeing (highest mean anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disturbances; lowest mean perceived health and wellbeing). Comprehensive copers fared worse in anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disturbances compared to strengths-based psychological copers; however, comprehensive copers reported greater wellbeing, perceived health, and academic motivation.

中文翻译：

---

无证大学生保护型家庭沟通与优势心理应对的潜在概况分析

本研究借鉴复原力理论，根据无证大学生 (UCS) 的保护导向型家庭沟通模式和基于优势的心理应对模式，探索了他们的亚群。使用来自 237 个 UCS 的调查数据，潜在概况分析揭示了三个亚组。安全乐观的应对者报告偶尔会寻求文件和了解你的权利沟通，但在预防和正确路径沟通方面的手段更高，以及乐观应对。综合应对者在各类保护型沟通和心理应对中得分中等。基于优势的心理应对者很少进行保护导向的沟通，但他们在积极心理应对方面得分中等至中等。与其他两个配置文件相比，安全乐观的应对者报告了最差的幸福感（最高的平均焦虑、抑郁症状和睡眠障碍；最低的平均感知健康和幸福感）。与基于优势的心理应对者相比，综合应对者在焦虑、抑郁症状和睡眠障碍方面的表现更差；然而，综合性工作者报告了更大的幸福感、感知的健康和学术动机。