This review of Hoskins’ book on the collateral legal consequences of a criminal conviction focuses on some of the consequences of his concept of collateral legal consequences for our understanding of justifications of criminalization, the theory of punishment and incapacitation upon which it rests, and the implications for the prosecutor’s role that goes beyond Hoskins’ suggestions in the last part of the book. The review particularly engages with Hoskins’ distinction between punishment and incapacitation, which forms the core of his defense of collateral sanctions as in principle capable of moral justification and his excellent discussion of contemptuous punishment, which he uses to sketch out the limits of both direct and indirect criminal sanctions.

霍斯金斯关于刑事定罪的附带法律后果的书的这篇评论集中在他的附带法律后果概念的一些后果上，以帮助我们理解刑事定罪的理由、惩罚和丧失行为能力的理论，以及其影响检察官的角色超出了本书最后一部分霍斯金斯的建议。该评论特别涉及霍斯金斯对惩罚和丧失行为能力之间的区别，这是他捍卫附带制裁原则上能够为道德辩护的核心，以及他对蔑视惩罚的精彩讨论，他用这些讨论勾勒出直接和丧失行为能力的限制。间接刑事制裁。