Academia, like many other institutions, is experiencing a racial reckoning. As part of this reckoning, members of institutions of higher education are reflecting on how their structures and cultures reproduce racial inequality and how to disrupt the cycle. One aspect of this conversation that has escaped scrutiny has been methodological training, which can be central to the reproduction of inequality via the marginalization of researchers of color. Qualitive methods guidance and instruction has been criticized for leaving scholars of color unprepared to navigate the complex racial dynamics they confront in the field. In this article we build on these conversations by discussing colorblind spots that surfaced in our graduate-level qualitative methods course in Sociology related to one-time field exercises and fieldwork in a continuous site. We conclude with reflections and recommendations for ethnographic training courses.

与许多其他机构一样，学术界正在经历种族清算。作为这种清算的一部分，高等教育机构的成员正在反思他们的结构和文化如何再现种族不平等以及如何打破这种循环。这场对话中逃脱审查的一个方面是方法论培训，这可能是通过边缘化有色人种研究人员来再现不平等的核心。质量方法指导和指导因让有色人种学者没有准备好应对他们在该领域面临的复杂种族动态而受到批评。在本文中，我们通过讨论在我们的社会学研究生级别的定性方法课程中出现的与一次性实地练习和连续站点实地工作相关的色盲点来建立这些对话。