This article argues that the concept of deliberation is construed too narrowly in political corporate social responsibility (CSR) and that a concept of deliberation for political CSR should err toward useful speech acts rather than reciprocity and charity. It draws from the political philosophy, labor relations, and business ethics literatures to outline a framework for an extended notion of deliberative engagement. The characters of deliberative behavior and deliberative environment are held to generate four modes of engagement: strategic deliberation, unitarist deliberation, pluralist deliberation, and deliberative activism. The article concludes by arguing that political CSR will be better positioned to realize its potential by moving away from primarily consensus-centered objectives to a more responsive range of deliberative goals and practice.

本文认为，在政治企业社会责任（CSR）中，审议的概念过于狭隘，政治企业社会责任的审议概念应该偏向于有用的言论行为，而不是互惠和慈善。它从政治哲学、劳资关系和商业道德文献中汲取灵感，为协商参与的扩展概念勾勒出一个框架。审议行为和审议环境的特征被认为产生了四种参与模式：战略审议、统一审议、多元审议和审议行动主义。文章最后认为，通过从主要以共识为中心的目标转向更具响应性的审议目标和实践范围，政治企业社会责任将更好地发挥其潜力。