∞ After belatedly apologizing for the cholera epidemic in Haiti, the ‘New Approach to Cholera in Haiti’ by the UN and the promise of material assistance to victims through a ‘victim-centred approach’ highlight how the victims turn and the socio-economic turn are increasingly pivotal in the field of transitional justice. In light of these growing calls, we suggest a matrix to clarify the debate made of two separate dimensions: the focus of reparations – collective versus individual – and the means of reparations – symbolic versus material. Based on fieldwork conducted in March 2017 in the communities most affected by the cholera outbreak, this article demonstrates how the tensions between reparations offered by the UN (with a preference for collective symbolic reparations) and the reparations demanded by the victims (individual material reparations) can help understand the current stalemate in Haiti, and hopefully inform the next steps in the process of remedy for the victims.

中文翻译：

---

评估赔偿中的社会经济转向：海地霍乱受害者的过渡正义

∞ 在为海地的霍乱流行道歉后，联合国的“海地霍乱新方法”以及通过“以受害者为中心的方法”向受害者提供物质援助的承诺突出了受害者的转变和社会经济转变在过渡司法领域越来越重要。鉴于这些日益增长的呼声，我们建议使用一个矩阵来澄清由两个不同维度构成的辩论：赔偿的焦点——集体与个人——以及赔偿手段——象征性与物质性。根据 2017 年 3 月在受霍乱疫情影响最严重的社区开展的实地调查，