The focus of this article is a re-count of Richard Carrington’s original sunspot observations from his book drawings (Carrington in Observations of the Spots on the Sun from November 9, 1853, to March 24, 1861 Made at Redhill, Williams and Norgate, London, 1863) by an observer from the World Data Center-SILSO (WDC-SILSO, http://www.sidc.be/silso/home) network, Thomas H. Teague (UK). This modern re-count will enable the recomputation of the entire Sunspot Number series in a way Carrington’s original counts (Casas and Vaquero in Solar Phys. 289(1), 79, 2014) did not. Here we present comparison studies of the new re-counted series with contemporary observations, new data extracted from the Journals of the Zürich Observatory and other sources of Carrington’s own observations and conclude that Carrington’s group counting is very close to the modern way of counting while his method for counting individual spots lags significantly behind modern counts. We also test the quality and robustness of the new recount with methods developed in Mathieu et al. (Astrophys. J. 886(1), 7, 2019).

这篇文章的重点是重新计算理查德卡林顿从他的书画中对太阳黑子的原始观测（卡林顿在 1853 年 11 月 9 日至 1861 年 3 月 24 日的太阳黑子观测中，伦敦红山，威廉姆斯和诺盖特制造, 1863) 来自世界数据中心-SILSO (WDC-SILSO, http://www.sidc.be/silso/home) 网络的观察员 Thomas H. Teague（英国）。这种现代重新计数将使整个太阳黑子数系列能够以 Carrington 的原始计数方式重新计算（Casas 和 Vaquero in Solar Phys. 289(1), 79, 2014) 没有。在这里，我们展示了新的重新计数系列与当代观察、从苏黎世天文台期刊和其他卡林顿自己的观察来源中提取的新数据的比较研究，并得出结论，卡林顿的群体计数非常接近现代计数方式，而他的计算单个斑点的方法明显落后于现代计数。我们还使用 Mathieu 等人开发的方法测试了新重新计数的质量和稳健性。（天体物理学杂志。J. 886 (1), 7, 2019）。