ABSTRACT

This research upholds the designer's mediatory role in the representation of places and hand drawing as a privileged tool. Given the current technological capacity for an automatic representation of the territory and landscape, one can question if the hand that draws the map is now anachronistic. The hypothesis of hybridism between the landscape observational drawing and the cartographic code is proposed, supported by the historical analysis of maps from the sixteenth century. The resultant anachronistic techniques are systematized as a design strategy, available for use by other authors, elsewhere. The techniques were tested by drawing landscapes and producing maps of places. It is concluded that the transference of anachronistic techniques is relevant in contemporary maps intended for touristic, cultural and commercial contexts, when wayfinding skills are not essential. As an open source, other authors may use the same strategy, applying different anachronistic techniques, based on their own subjectivity.

摘要

这项研究支持设计师在代表地点和手绘作为一种特权工具方面的中介作用。鉴于目前自动表示领土和景观的技术能力，人们可以质疑绘制地图的手现在是否不合时宜。在对 16 世纪地图的历史分析的支持下，提出了景观观察图和制图代码之间的混合假设。由此产生的不合时宜的技术被系统化为一种设计策略，可供其他作者在其他地方使用。这些技术通过绘制景观和制作地点地图进行了测试。结论是，过时技术的转移与用于旅游、文化和商业环境的当代地图相关，当寻路技能不是必不可少的时候。作为开源，其他作者可能会使用相同的策略，根据自己的主观性应用不同的不合时宜的技术。