当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Journal of Criminal Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Parole Board as ‘functus officio’: R (Dickins) v Parole Board [2021] EWHC 1166 (Admin)
The Journal of Criminal Law ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-13 , DOI: 10.1177/00220183211034160
Andrew Beetham

This origins of this case are highly dependent upon its facts, however, the resulting issues in the case were ones of legal principle. On 31 July 2002, the Claimant was convicted of murder and sentenced to the mandatory life sentence. His minimum term was set at 18 years, which expired in September 2019. Prior to the expiry of his minimum term, the Claimant was transferred to HMP Hollesley Bay open prison in December 2017. Upon the expiry of his minimum term, the Claimant became eligible for regular reviews of his continued detention by the Parole Board (the Defendant).

中文翻译:

假释委员会作为 'functus officio':R (Dickins) v Parole Board [2021] EWHC 1166 (Admin)

本案的起因很大程度上取决于其事实,但由此产生的本案问题是法律原则问题。2002 年 7 月 31 日,索赔人被判犯有谋杀罪并被判处终身监禁。他的最低刑期定为 18 年,于 2019 年 9 月届满。在其最低刑期届满之前,索赔人于 2017 年 12 月被转移到 HMP Hollesley Bay 开放式监狱。在他的最低刑期届满后,索赔人符合资格假释委员会(被告)对其继续拘留的定期审查。
更新日期:2021-08-15
down
wechat
bug