Transgender (trans) survivors are infrequently included in the intimate partner violence (IPV) literature, and they are rarely the central subjects of IPV research. Similarly, trans survivors are rarely at the center of IPV service provision. In this article we articulate the importance of centering trans survivors in IPV research and practice through developing a nuanced understanding of the unique manifestations of abuse for trans individuals. Using intersectionality (Collins, 2019; Crenshaw, 1989, 1991) as our theoretical framework, we discuss the manifestations of dominance in trans IPV research and service provision. Specifically, we explain how cissexism, binarism, trans misogyny, and dysphoria reify White supremacist cisheteropatriarchy in intimate relationships, research, and service provision. We argue the importance of researchers and service providers alike to recognize and detect identity abuse tactics as well and how they contribute to the unique barriers trans survivors encounter to access resources and their help-seeking behaviors. With a more nuanced understanding of the ways that White supremacist cisheteropatriarchy affect trans individuals' experiences of IPV, researchers and service providers will be better able to understand and respond to abuse tactics used against trans people.

中文翻译：

---

以跨性别幸存者的亲密伴侣暴力受害经历为中心：对研究和服务提供的主要方法的批评。

跨性别（trans）幸存者很少被包含在亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）文献中，他们很少是 IPV 研究的中心主题。同样，跨性别幸存者很少处于 IPV 服务提供的中心。在这篇文章中，我们通过对跨性别个体虐待的独特表现进行细致入微的理解，阐明了在 IPV 研究和实践中以跨性别幸存者为中心的重要性。使用交叉性（Collins，2019；Crenshaw，1989，1991）作为我们的理论框架，我们讨论了跨 IPV 研究和服务提供中主导地位的表现。具体来说，我们解释了在亲密关系、研究和服务提供中，顺性别主义、二元主义、跨性别厌女症和焦虑症如何具体化白人至上主义的顺从父权制。我们认为研究人员和服务提供者同样认识到和检测身份滥用策略的重要性，以及它们如何促成跨性别幸存者在获取资源和寻求帮助行为方面遇到的独特障碍。随着对白人至上主义独裁父权制如何影响跨性别者的 IPV 体验的方式有了更细致的了解，研究人员和服务提供商将能够更好地理解和应对针对跨性别者的滥用策略。