当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Personality and Social Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ( IF 6.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-12 , DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000341
Thomas H Costello 1 , Shauna M Bowes 1 , Sean T Stevens 2 , Irwin D Waldman 1 , Arber Tasimi 1 , Scott O Lilienfeld 1
Affiliation  

Authoritarianism has been the subject of scientific inquiry for nearly a century, yet the vast majority of authoritarianism research has focused on right-wing authoritarianism. In the present studies, we investigate the nature, structure, and nomological network of left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), a construct famously known as "the Loch Ness Monster" of political psychology. We iteratively construct a measure and data-driven conceptualization of LWA across six samples (N = 7,258) and conduct quantitative tests of LWA's relations with more than 60 authoritarianism-related variables. We find that LWA, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation reflect a shared constellation of personality traits, cognitive features, beliefs, and motivational values that might be considered the "heart" of authoritarianism. Relative to right-wing authoritarians, left-wing authoritarians were lower in dogmatism and cognitive rigidity, higher in negative emotionality, and expressed stronger support for a political system with substantial centralized state control. Our results also indicate that LWA powerfully predicts behavioral aggression and is strongly correlated with participation in political violence. We conclude that a movement away from exclusively right-wing conceptualizations of authoritarianism may be required to illuminate authoritarianism's central features, conceptual breadth, and psychological appeal. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

阐明左翼威权主义的结构和性质。

近一个世纪以来,威权主义一直是科学研究的主题,但绝大多数威权主义研究都集中在右翼威权主义上。在目前的研究中,我们调查了左翼威权主义 (LWA) 的性质、结构和法律网络,这是一种著名的政治心理学结构,被称为“尼斯湖水怪”。我们在六个样本(N = 7,258)中迭代地构建 LWA 的度量和数据驱动的概念化,并对 LWA 与 60 多个威权主义相关变量的关系进行定量测试。我们发现 LWA、右翼威权主义和社会支配取向反映了人格特征、认知特征、信仰和动机价值观的共同星座,这些可能被认为是威权主义的“核心”。相对于右翼威权主义者,左翼威权主义者的教条主义和认知僵化程度较低,消极情绪较高,并且对具有高度中央集权的国家控制的政治制度表达了更强的支持。我们的结果还表明,LWA 可以有力地预测行为攻击,并且与参与政治暴力密切相关。我们的结论是,为了阐明威权主义的核心特征、概念广度和心理吸引力,可能需要摆脱完全右翼的威权主义概念化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。并表示更强烈地支持具有大量中央集权的国家控制的政治制度。我们的结果还表明,LWA 可以有力地预测行为攻击,并且与参与政治暴力密切相关。我们的结论是,为了阐明威权主义的核心特征、概念广度和心理吸引力,可能需要摆脱完全右翼的威权主义概念化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。并表示更强烈地支持具有大量中央集权的国家控制的政治制度。我们的结果还表明,LWA 可以有力地预测行为攻击,并且与参与政治暴力密切相关。我们的结论是,为了阐明威权主义的核心特征、概念广度和心理吸引力,可能需要摆脱完全右翼的威权主义概念化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。我们的结论是,为了阐明威权主义的核心特征、概念广度和心理吸引力,可能需要摆脱完全右翼的威权主义概念化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。我们的结论是,为了阐明威权主义的核心特征、概念广度和心理吸引力,可能需要摆脱完全右翼的威权主义概念化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2021-08-12
down
wechat
bug