The globalisation of employment relationships means that the international aspects of employment law are important in an ever growing number of cases. In particular, international employment cases may raise issues relating to international jurisdiction, choice of law and territorial scope. Before the UK left the EU, directly effective EU Regulations regulating jurisdiction and choice of law provided the rules which are applied in a large number of cases. This article outlines the changes post-Brexit and the resulting overlapping regimes which now govern international employment cases. The choice of law rules in the Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation remain as part of retained EU law. International jurisdiction will now be governed entirely by national law rules. However, for cases in the High Court, the common law rules are amended to mirror the provisions which are previously applied under the Brussels I Regulation recast. Although in many cases the rules look the same, different principles of interpretation will apply, and, longer term, now that the rules are not binding as matter of EU there will be scope to amend and reform the rules.

中文翻译：

---

英国脱欧后的国际就业案例：法律选择、地域范围、管辖权和执法

雇佣关系的全球化意味着雇佣法的国际方面在越来越多的案件中变得重要。特别是，国际就业案件可能会引发与国际管辖权、法律选择和地域范围有关的问题。在英国离开欧盟之前，直接有效的欧盟规范管辖权和法律选择的法规提供了适用于大量案件的规则。本文概述了英国脱欧后的变化以及由此产生的现在管辖国际就业案件的重叠制度。《罗马一条例》和《罗马二条例》中的法律选择规则仍然是保留的欧盟法律的一部分。国际管辖权现在将完全由国家法律规则管辖。但是，对于高等法院的案件，对普通法规则进行了修订，以反映先前根据布鲁塞尔 I 条例重订的规定。尽管在许多情况下规则看起来相同，但将适用不同的解释原则，并且从长远来看，由于这些规则对欧盟没有约束力，因此将有修改和改革规则的空间。