Objective

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a modified reduced-dose rituximab (mRTX) regimen compared with azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 71 patients with NMOSD were treated with AZA (n = 24), MMF (n = 18), or mRTX (n = 29). The primary outcome was initial relapse after first-line immunosuppressant therapy. The annualized relapse rate (ARR), expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, activities of daily living (ADL) scale score, and treatment-related adverse events were compared between groups.

Results

Significant ARR reductions were observed in the three groups, with relapse-free rates of 37.5%, 72.2%, and 79.3% in the AZA, MMF, and RTX groups, respectively. Compared with AZA, mRTX and MMF significantly reduced the NMOSD relapse risk. Relapse within 1 year before immunosuppressant therapy or ARR before immunosuppressant therapy increased the NMOSD relapse risk. mRTX and MMF were superior to AZA in reducing the EDSS score and increasing the ADL score, but there was no significant difference between the mRTX and MMF groups. Additionally, mRTX-treated patients were less likely to use steroids concurrently than those treated with AZA and MMF. The adverse event rate in the AZA group was relatively higher than that in the MMF and mRTX groups, though no significant difference was noted among the three groups.

Conclusions

Compared with AZA, mRTX and MMF significantly reduced the NMOSD relapse risk. mRTX-treated patients presented less concomitant steroid use than those treated with AZA and MMF, fewer adverse events, and better tolerance.