This study examines how risk and strength factors inform treatment typologies over time and how these typologies relate to reoffending outcomes for 1,684 women on community supervision in Alberta, Canada. Latent transition analysis was conducted using three assessment timepoints. Three profiles consistently emerged across timepoints: a Low need/low strength profile, a Low need/high strength profile with adversity and mental health concerns, and an Aggressive, high need/low strength profile, which had the highest rate of reoffending. Results underscore the utility of incorporating gender-neutral and gender-responsive needs and strengths in typological development. Treatment typologies help inform effective service delivery, programming, and supervision practices.

本研究探讨了风险和强度因素如何随着时间的推移影响治疗类型，以及这些类型与加拿大艾伯塔省 1,684 名接受社区监督的妇女的再犯罪结果有何关系。使用三个评估时间点进行潜在转变分析。在时间点上始终出现三种情况：低需求/低强度配置，具有逆境和心理健康问题的低需求/高强度配置，以及具有最高再犯罪率的激进、高需求/低强度配置。结果强调了将性别中立和性别敏感的需求和优势纳入类型发展的效用。治疗类型有助于为有效的服务提供、规划和监督实践提供信息。