In the wake of contemporary controversies in France over feminist misandry, this article reflects on claimed hatred of men as a feminist discursive resource. I use the reception of Valerie Solanas’ SCUM Manifesto by some radical French feminists of the 1970s as a privileged case study, along with historian Colette Pipon’s study on misandry within French second-wave feminist movements and Judith Butler’s works on stigma reversal. I contend that in a seemingly paradoxical way, misandry is both an anti-feminist stigma and a feminist discursive strategy: the inhibiting effects of such injurious term on feminist politics – the aggressive, castrating and hateful feminist you should at all cost avoid to become – can be managed, if not neutralized, by means of feminist misandry. From that point, I argue that claimed hatred of men can open fruitful political venues in challenging the stifling effects of respectability politics.

在法国对女权主义的通病进行当代争议之后，本文将声称对男性的仇恨作为女权主义的话语资源进行了反思。我使用 1970 年代一些激进的法国女权主义者对瓦莱丽·索拉纳斯 (Valerie Solanas) 的《人渣宣言》(SCUM Manifesto) 的接受作为特权案例研究，同时使用历史学家科莱特·皮蓬 (Colette Pipon) 对法国第二波女权主义运动中的不当行为的研究以及朱迪思·巴特勒 (Judith Butler) 对污名逆转的研究。我认为，以一种看似自相矛盾的方式，misandry 既是一种反女权主义的污名，也是一种女权主义的话语策略：这种有害的术语对女权主义政治的抑制作用——你应该不惜一切代价避免成为侵略性、阉割和仇恨的女权主义者——可以通过女权主义的恶作剧来管理，如果不能消除。从那时起，