The aim of this article is to provide an overview of various discourses relevant to developing a construct of collective phronesis, from a (neo)-Aristotelian perspective, with implications for professional practice in general and business practice and business ethics education in particular. Despite the proliferation of interest in practical wisdom within business ethics and more general areas of both psychology and philosophy, the focus has remained mostly on the construct at the level of individual decision-making, as in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. However, he also made intriguing remarks about phronesis at the collective level in his Politics: remarks that have mostly eluded elaboration. The aim of this article is practical and revisionary, rather than exegetical and deferential, with respect to Aristotle. Nevertheless, just as most of the literature on individual phronesis draws on Aristotle’s exposition in the Nicomachean Ethics, the obvious first port of call for an analysis of collective phronesis is to explore the resources handed down to us by Aristotle himself. The lion’s share of this article is, therefore, devoted to making sense of Aristotle’s somewhat unsystematic remarks and the lessons we can draw from them about collective managerial phronesis and business ethics education.

这篇文章的目的是提供相关的开发集体的构造各种话语的概述实践智慧，从（新）-Aristotelian观点为，特别是在一般和商业实践和商业道德教育的专业实践意义。尽管商业伦理和心理学和哲学的更一般领域对实践智慧的兴趣激增，但重点仍然主要放在个人决策层面的结构上，如亚里士多德的尼各马可伦理学。然而，他也在他的《政治学》中对集体层面的phronesis发表了有趣的评论。: 大部分都没有详细说明的评论。关于亚里士多德，本文的目的是实用和修正，而不是解经和恭敬。然而，正如大多数关于个人phronesis的文献都借鉴了亚里士多德在《尼各马可伦理学》中的论述，对集体phresis进行分析的第一个明显呼吁是探索亚里士多德本人传给我们的资源。这篇文章的大部分份额，因此，致力于使亚里士多德的有些无章可循的言论，我们可以从中得出关于集体管理的经验教训的意义实践智慧和商业道德教育。