Abstract

Based on existing approaches to assessing the quality of life and similar concepts in human capital management, a quality of life index for young people is proposed. It takes into account the factors of four groups that determine the subjective satisfaction with the quality of life: Economic environment; Socio-political environment; Social environment; Natural environment. Partial factors and their corresponding quality of life indicators are adapted to the assessments of young people, whose needs and interests differ significantly from other age groups due to differences in the values of generations and features of economic activity at a young age. The methodology developed by the authors is based on taking into account subjective assessments of the level of satisfaction with quality of life factors, as well as their importance based on the determination of weights. As a result of testing the methodology, it was found that the most important factors for a positive perception of quality of life are the social environment, in particular, family relationships and health. Economic and environmental factors have approximately the same effect. Socio-political environment factors have the least influence. Due to material well-being and the quality of socio-political life, satisfaction with the life of employed youth is slightly higher (by 3%). Instead, respondents who do not work are more satisfied with social comfort. The integrated index of quality of life of the interviewed youth is 3,438 points out of 5 maximum. The methodology and results of the assessment are useful for the development of national and regional programs and strategies of human capital development due to increase the level of satisfaction of material, spiritual and cultural needs of young people.

摘要

基于现有的生活质量评估方法和人力资本管理中的类似概念，提出了年轻人的生活质量指数。它考虑了决定对生活质量的主观满意度的四组因素：经济环境；社会政治环境；社会环境; 自然环境。部分因素及其相应的生活质量指标适用于年轻人的评估，他们的需求和兴趣与其他年龄组由于世代价值和年轻时经济活动特征的差异而存在显着差异。作者开发的方法是基于对生活质量因素满意度的主观评估，以及基于权重确定的重要性。作为测试该方法的结果，发现对生活质量产生积极看法的最重要因素是社会环境，特别是家庭关系和健康。经济和环境因素的影响大致相同。社会政治环境因素的影响最小。由于物质福利和社会政治生活的质量，对就业青年的生活满意度略高（3%）。相反，不工作的受访者对社会舒适度更满意。受访青年的生活质量综合指数为 3,438 分，满分为 5 分。