This article examines organized opposition to feminist and LGBTI political projects in Colombia. Although there is a large body of literature on feminist movements and a growing literature on LGBTI movements, there is little research on resistance to them. Through an intersectional feminist lens, this study analyzes the “anti-gender” campaign organized against the gender perspective in Colombia’s 2016 peace agreement to demonstrate the limitations of backlash theory and certain normative understandings of human rights. In contrast to assumptions that backlash is predetermined, the study demonstrates that the anti-gender mobilization against the peace agreement was circumstantial rather than inevitable. To highlight the productive nature of backlash, it traces how opponents employed human rights rhetoric to establish an alternative present and promote an imagined future rooted in exclusion and repression. In addition, it shows that mobilized backlash against feminist and LGBTI movements does not necessarily decelerate or reverse the respective movements’ agendas.

中文翻译：

---

关于妇女权利的战略用途：哥伦比亚 2016 年和平协议中的反弹、基于权利的框架和反性别运动

本文考察了哥伦比亚对女权主义和 LGBTI 政治项目的有组织反对。尽管有大量关于女权运动的文献和越来越多关于 LGBTI 运动的文献，但很少有关于抵制它们的研究。通过交叉女权主义视角，本研究分析了针对哥伦比亚 2016 年和平协议中的性别观点组织的“反性别”运动，以证明反弹理论的局限性和对人权的某些规范性理解。与反弹是预先确定的假设相反，该研究表明，反对和平协议的反性别动员是偶然的，而不是不可避免的。为了突出反弹的生产性，它追溯了反对者如何利用人权言论来建立另一种现在并促进根植于排斥和压制的想象未来。此外，它表明，针对女权主义和 LGBTI 运动的强烈反对并不一定会减缓或逆转各自运动的议程。