当前位置: X-MOL 学术Heart Vessels › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Prognosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients on hemodialysis stratified by Killip classification in the modern interventional era (focus on the prognosis of Killip class 1)
Heart and Vessels ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-04 , DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-01919-7
Akihiro Takasaki 1 , Tairo Kurita 1 , Yosuke Hirabayashi 1 , Hiroshi Matsuo 2 , Akiko Tanoue 3 , Jun Masuda 4 , Takashi Yamanaka 5 , Kan Katayama 1 , Hirofumi Machida 6 , Takehiko Ichikawa 7 , Masaaki Ito 1 , Kaoru Dohi 1
Affiliation  

Cardiovascular events and death are more prevalent in hemodialysis (HD) patients than in the general population. However, a detailed prognostic risk stratification of HD patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not yet been performed in the modern interventional era. We examined 4509 AMI patients (89 AMI/HD and 4420 AMI/non-HD) from the Mie ACS registry and detailed prognostic analyses based on the Killip classification were performed (Cohort A). In addition, prognosis of Killip class1 AMI/HD was compared with those of 313 non-AMI/HD patients from the MIE-CARE HD study using propensity score-matching method (Cohort B). Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality for up to 2 years. All-cause death occurred in 13.0% of AMI/non-HD and 35.8% of AMI/HD during follow-up, and patients with Killip class 1 had lower 30-day and 2-year mortality than those with Killip class ≥ 2 in both AMI/non-HD and AMI/HD. Cox regression analyses identified that Killip class ≥ 2 was the strongest independent prognostic factor of 30-day mortality with a hazard ratio of 7.44 (p < 0.001), whereas both presence of HD and Killip class ≥ 2 were the independent prognostic factors of mortality for up to 2 years. In Cohort B, a propensity score-matching analysis revealed similar all-cause mortality rates between Killip class 1 AMI/HD and non-AMI/HD. In HD patients with Killip class 1 AMI, 30-day mortality was around 6%, and long-term mortality among 30-day survivors after AMI was comparable with the natural course of HD patients in the modern interventional era. Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm. UMIN000036020 and UMIN000008128



中文翻译:

现代介入时代Killip分级分层血液透析患者急性心肌梗死的预后(重点关注Killip 1级预后)

心血管事件和死亡在血液透析 (HD) 患者中比在一般人群中更为普遍。然而,在现代介入时代尚未对患有急性心肌梗死 (AMI) 的 HD 患者进行详细的预后风险分层。我们检查了来自 Mie ACS 登记的 4509 名 AMI 患者(89 名 AMI/HD 和 4420 名 AMI/非 HD),并根据 Killip 分类进行了详细的预后分析(队列 A)。此外,使用倾向评分匹配法(队列 B)将 Killip 1 类 AMI/HD 的预后与来自 MIE-CARE HD 研究的 313 名非 AMI/HD 患者的预后进行了比较。主要终点是长达 2 年的全因死亡率。随访期间全因死亡发生率为 13.0% 的 AMI/非 HD 和 35.8% 的 AMI/HD,在 AMI/非 HD 和 AMI/HD 中,Killip 1 级患者的 30 天和 2 年死亡率均低于 Killip ≥ 2 级的患者。Cox 回归分析发现,Killip ≥ 2 级是 30 天死亡率最强的独立预后因素,风险比为 7.44(p  < 0.001),而 HD 和 Killip 分级 ≥ 2 是长达 2 年死亡率的独立预后因素。在队列 B 中,倾向评分匹配分析显示 Killip 1 级 AMI/HD 和非 AMI/HD 之间的全因死亡率相似。在具有 Killip 1 级 AMI 的 HD 患者中,30 天死亡率约为 6%,AMI 后 30 天幸存者的长期死亡率与现代介入时代 HD 患者的自然病程相当。临床试验注册:网址:https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm。UMIN000036020 和 UMIN000008128

更新日期:2021-08-04
down
wechat
bug