Governance of natural resources is inherently complex and requires navigating trade-offs at multiple dimensions. In this paper, we present and operationalize the “governance disruptions framework” (GDF) as a tool for holistic analysis of natural resource governance systems. For each of the four dimensions of the framework (target adequacy, object adequacy, instrument adequacy, and behavioural adequacy), we formulate guiding questions to be used when applying the framework to particular governance systems. We then demonstrate the use of GDF by applying it to the core of German agricultural soil policy. We show that for each framework dimension, the governance system exhibits deficits, particularly with respect to object adequacy and instrument adequacy. Furthermore, we use the GDF-based analysis to highlight research gaps. We find that stakeholder analyses are a central gap across GDF dimensions.

中文翻译：

---

治理中断框架在德国农业土壤政策中的应用

自然资源的治理本质上是复杂的，需要在多个维度上进行权衡。在本文中，我们提出并实施了“治理中断框架”（GDF），作为对自然资源治理系统进行整体分析的工具。对于框架的四个维度（目标充分性、对象充分性、工具充分性和行为充分性）中的每一个，我们制定了将框架应用于特定治理系统时要使用的指导性问题。然后，我们通过将 GDF 应用于德国农业土壤政策的核心来演示 GDF 的使用。我们表明，对于每个框架维度，治理系统都存在缺陷，特别是在对象充分性和工具充分性方面。此外，我们使用基于 GDF 的分析来突出研究差距。