This commentary is an attempt to present some additional alternatives to the suggestions made by Reise et al. (2021). IRT models as they are used for patient-reported outcome (PRO) scales may not be fully satisfactory when used with commonly made assumptions. The suggested change to an alternative parameterization is critically reflected with the intent to initiate discussion around more comprehensive alternatives that allow for more complex latent structures having the potential to be more appropriate for PRO scales as they are applied to diverse populations.

中文翻译：

---

评论：将 IRT 模型与 PRO 构建体相匹配——建模替代方案，以及关于什么使模型与众不同的一些想法

本评论试图为 Reise 等人提出的建议提供一些额外的替代方案。(2021)。用于患者报告结果 (PRO) 量表的 IRT 模型在与常用假设一起使用时可能无法完全令人满意。对替代参数化的建议更改被批判性地反映，目的是围绕更全面的替代方案展开讨论，这些替代方案允许更复杂的潜在结构，因为它们有可能更适合 PRO 量表，因为它们适用于不同的人群。