Romantic perfectionismi can be disruptive to relationships, yet no validated measure for assessing romantic perfectionism in Iranian couples has been developed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Romantic Perfectionism Scale (RPS) among Iranian couples. Participants in the study were 200 married men and 320 married women from Tehran, Iran, who completed the translated RPS, the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 online. Item impact scores were used to calculate face validity. Impact score values for all items were greater than 1.5, signaling appropriate face validity.. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were used to measure content validity. Values of the CVI were above the cut-off score of 0.7, implying satisfactory content validity of the items. The CVR values were greater than the Lawshe table (0.78) cut-off score, demonstrating that all items were essential. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using AMOS software was used to evaluate the construct validity. The results of the goodness of fit indices confirmed the RPS with two subscales (i.e., self-oriented romantic perfectionism and other-oriented romantic perfectionism) as per the original scale. All items remained in the scale as all factor loading values were greater than 0.45. The findings showed that the two subscales, and the scale as a whole, had acceptable internal consistency, as the construct reliability values for self-oriented romantic perfectionism (0.81), other-oriented romantic perfectionism (0.72), and the whole scale (0.74) were greater than 0.7. The results support the psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the RPS, which could be used by future researchers and clinicians to assess romantic perfectionism in Iranian couples.

浪漫完美主义可能会破坏人际关系，但尚未开发出有效的衡量伊朗夫妇浪漫完美主义的方法。因此，本研究的目的是翻译和验证伊朗夫妇的浪漫完美主义量表（RPS）。该研究的参与者是来自伊朗德黑兰的 200 名已婚男性和 320 名已婚女性，他们在线完成了翻译后的 RPS、几乎完美的量表修订版和抑郁焦虑压力量表 21。项目影响分数用于计算面部效度。所有项目的影响得分值均大于 1.5，表明适当的表面效度。内容效度指数 (CVI) 和内容效度比 (CVR) 用于衡量内容效度。CVI 的值高于 0.7 的截止分数，暗示项目的内容有效性令人满意。CVR 值大于 Lawshe 表 (0.78) 截止分数，表明所有项目都是必不可少的。使用 AMOS 软件的验证性因素分析 (CFA) 用于评估结构的有效性。拟合优度指数的结果证实了RPS与原始量表一样具有两个分量表（即自我导向的浪漫完美主义和其他导向的浪漫完美主义）。由于所有因子载荷值均大于 0.45，因此所有项目均保留在量表中。结果表明，两个分量表以及整个量表具有可接受的内部一致性，作为以自我为导向的浪漫完美主义（0.81）、以他人为导向的浪漫完美主义（0.72）和整个量表（0.74）的结构信度值) 大于 0.7。