ABSTRACT

Given our situatedness as political subjects of knowledge — as activists and scholars from Southern Europe — we have mapped out in this issue some feminist responses to populism. This issue discusses diverse transfeminist and feminist political groups and ideas, and talks about feminisms as a constellation of accounts of politics, practices, knowledges, and experiences. Although it is beyond the scope of this issue to discuss the idea of populism, the plurality of definitions and their political implications, this collection of essays reflects our need to analyse modes of self-determination that, within feminism, are taking place in the name of the people and for the people. This Introduction sketches the situatedness of the essays in Southern Europe, the antifeminist backlash and the feminist responses that we have been witnessing in the past few years, and the appropriation of feminism by certain conservative groups.

摘要

鉴于我们作为知识的政治主体——作为来自南欧的活动家和学者——的处境，我们在这个问题上描绘了一些女权主义对民粹主义的回应。本期讨论了不同的跨女权主义和女权主义政治团体和思想，并将女权主义视为政治、实践、知识和经验的集合。虽然讨论民粹主义的概念、定义的多元化及其政治含义超出了本期的范围，但本系列文章反映了我们需要分析在女权主义中以名义发生的自决模式。为人民和为人民。这篇引言勾勒了这些论文在南欧的位置，