当前位置: X-MOL 学术Glob. Environ. Chang. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Climate change action as a project of identity: Eight meta-analyses
Global Environmental Change ( IF 8.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-29 , DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102322
Stepan Vesely 1 , Torsten Masson 2 , Parissa Chokrai 2 , Anna M. Becker 2 , Immo Fritsche 2 , Christian A. Klöckner 1 , Lorenza Tiberio 3 , Giuseppe Carrus 3 , Angelo Panno 4
Affiliation  

Identity can improve our understanding of personal climate action, particularly when climate action becomes an expression of a person’s self. However, it is unclear which kind of self or identity is most relevant. Building on a comprehensive series of eight meta-analyses (using data from 188 published articles, N = 414,282 participants) this research systematically compares how strongly climate-friendly intentions and behaviors are associated with place identity, personal connectedness to nature, environmental self-identity (i.e., personal self-definition as a pro-environmentally acting person), and social identity (i.e., identification with social groups). Results suggest robust, medium-sized to strong links of both pro-environmental intentions and behaviors to people’s nature connectedness (r = 0.44/0.52), environmental self-identity (r = 0.62/0.56), and identification with groups considered to support climate-friendly behavior (r = 0.48/0.51), but markedly weaker effects for identification with groups which are unrelated to environmental topics (r = 0.30/0.15) and for place identity (r = 0.18/0.32). Implications for policy interventions and psychological theory are discussed.



中文翻译:

作为身份项目的气候变化行动:八项荟萃分析

身份可以提高我们对个人气候行动的理解,特别是当气候行动成为一个人自我的表达时。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种自我或身份最相关。基于八项综合分析的综合系列(使用来自 188 篇已发表文章的数据,N  = 414,282 名参与者),该研究系统地比较了气候友好型意图和行为与地方身份、个人与自然的联系、环境自我身份的关联程度(即个人自我定义为环保人士)和社会身份(即与社会群体的认同)。结果表明,亲环境意图和行为与人们的自然联系之间存在稳健的、中等至强的联系(r = 0.44/0.52)、环境自我认同 ( r  = 0.62/0.56) 和认同被认为支持气候友好行为的群体 ( r  = 0.48/0.51),但认同与环境无关的群体的影响明显较弱主题 ( r  = 0.30/0.15) 和地点标识 ( r  = 0.18/0.32)。讨论了政策干预和心理学理论的影响。

更新日期:2021-07-29
down
wechat
bug